The Lancet Oncology – Volume 16 – Issue 11 – September 2015
The Lancet Oncology: Over three-‐quarters of people with cancer worldwide have no access to safe surgery
Failure to train more cancer surgeons and strengthen surgical systems could cost the global economy more than US$6 trillion by 2030
**Embargo: 13:45 [UK time] Monday 28 September, 2015**
Over 80% of the 15 million people diagnosed with cancer worldwide in 2015 will need surgery, but less than a quarter will have access to proper, safe, affordable surgical care when they need it, according to a major new Commission examining the state of global cancer surgery, published in The Lancet Oncology, and being presented at the 2015 European Cancer Congress in Vienna, Austria.
The Commission reveals that access is worst in low-‐income countries where as many as 95% of people with cancer do not receive basic cancer surgery. Yet despite this worldwide shortfall in access to cancer surgery, surgical care is not seen as an essential component of global cancer control by the international community.
According to lead Commissioner, Professor Richard Sullivan, Institute of Cancer Policy, King’s Health Partners Comprehensive Cancer Centre, King’s College London, UK, “With many competing health priorities and substantial financial constraints in many low-‐ and middle-‐income countries, surgical services for cancer are given low priority within national cancer plans and are allocated few resources. As a result, access to safe, affordable cancer surgical services is dismal. Our new estimates suggest that less than one in twenty (5%) patients in low-‐income countries and only roughly one in five (22%) patients in middle-‐income countries can access even the most basic cancer surgery”.
Poor access to basic cancer surgery and good quality cancer care is not just confined to the world’s poorer countries. Survival data across Europe shows that many of the poorer EU member states are not delivering high quality cancer surgery to their populations.
Without urgent investment in surgical services for cancer care, global economic losses from cancers that could have been treated by surgery will reach a staggering US$12 trillion by 2030, equivalent to 1–1.5% of economic output in high-‐income countries (HICs) and 0.5–1% in low-‐ and middle-‐income countries (LMICs) every year. Furthermore, the lack of effective action to train more cancer surgeons and improving cancer surgical systems could cost the global economy more than US$ 6 trillion between now and 2030, says co-‐author
Professor John Meara, Director of the Program in Global Surgery and Social Change at Harvard Medical School in the USA.
Surgery is the mainstay of cancer control and cure, with over 80% of all cancers requiring some type of surgery, in many cases multiple times. Almost 300 different surgical procedures are used for diagnosis, curative, or palliative treatment of cancers in people of all ages including one in five children diagnosed with cancer.
The demand for cancer surgery is growing as many of the worst affected countries face rising cancer rates. By 2030, of the almost 22 million new cancer patients, over 17 million will need operations, 10 million of them in LMICs. “The global community can no longer ignore this problem,” says co-‐author Professor CS Pramesh, Head of Thoracic Surgery at Tata memorial Centre, Mumbai, India. “By 2030, 45 million operations a year will be needed worldwide. The situation is particularly dire in low-‐income countries in sub-‐Saharan Africa and Asia where the need for cancer surgery is projected to increase by around 60% between now and 2030.”
The Commission also reveals that a third of people with cancer in LMICs who have a surgical procedure will incur financial catastrophe—costs that drive them into poverty. Another quarter will stop treatment because they cannot afford it.
With a serious shortfall of cancer surgeons in over 82% of countries, radical action is needed to train general surgeons to deliver basic cancer surgery, produce more gynaecological and surgical oncologists, and create more high quality surgical training programmes, say the authors. Other solutions to improve access to surgery include: better regulated public systems; growing international partnerships between institutions and surgical societies, such as SSO and ESSO; and a firm commitment to universal health coverage.
Educating policymakers, patients, and the public about the key issues in delivering safe, affordable, timely surgical care is also essential, say the authors. “Policy makers at all levels still have little awareness of the central importance of surgery to cancer control. Even recent studies of capacity building for cancer systems in Africa barely acknowledged the importance of surgery, focusing mainly on chemotherapy instead,” says co-‐author Professor Riccardo Audisio, President of the European Society for Surgical Oncology.
According to the Commission, funding for research in cancer surgery is dire and needs urgent investment. Despite its huge impact on patient outcomes – with over 50% of survival in breast cancer, for example, credited to high quality surgery – just 1.3% of the annual global cancer research and development budget goes towards surgery. This figure is similar in the UK, with only 2.1% of research spending on cancer allocated to surgery. New estimates produced for the Commission find that 93% of global research in cancer surgery is done by just 34 of 195 countries. LMICs only account for 15% of this output, yet these countries urgently need to conduct research that is relevant to their settings.
According to Professor Sullivan, “This Commission clearly outlines the enormous scale of the problem posed by the global shortfall in access to cancer surgery and current deficiencies in pathology and imaging. The evidence outlined by the Commission, contributed by some of the world’s leading experts in the field, leaves no doubt of the dire situation we are facing. It is imperative that surgery is at the heart of global and national cancer plans. A powerful political commitment is needed in all countries to increase investment and training in publicly funded systems of cancer surgery.”
NOTES TO EDITORS:
 Quotes direct from authors and cannot be found in text of Commission.
 Cumulative gross domestic product (GDP) losses as a result of labour supply and capital stock.
 Society of Surgical Oncology; http://www.surgonc.org/
 European Society of Surgical Oncology; http://www.ecco-‐org.eu/About-‐Ecco/Members/ESSO
For interviews with Professor Richard Sullivan, King’s Centre for Global Health, King’s Health, King’s College London, UK please contact him directly on T) +44(0)7720398401 E) Richard.email@example.com or via King’s College London press office T) +44(0)20 7848 3202
For full Commission, see: http://press.thelancet.com/GlobalCancerSurgeryCommission.pdf
For Commission appendix, see:
NOTE: THE ABOVE LINKS ARE FOR JOURNALISTS ONLY; IF YOU WISH TO PROVIDE A LINK TO THIS PUBLICATION FOR YOUR READERS, PLEASE USE THE FOLLOWING, WHERE THE COMMISSION WILL BE PUBLISHED AT THE TIME THE EMBARGO LIFTS:
Download a Copy of the Issue Here
UICC calls for strengthening of essential surgical care for cancer
UICC addresses Ministers of Health at WHO Executive Board
Statement delivered by UICC at the 136th Session of the WHO Executive Board on “Strengthening emergency and essential surgical care and anaesthesia as a component of universal health coverage”
Chair, Honorable Ministers, Director General, ladies and gentlemen,
Thank you for the opportunity to deliver this statement on behalf of the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) – representing 800 member organisations across 155 countries.
In cancer, surgery is the primary modality for loco-regional disease control of solid tumours, a necessary component of curative therapy and vital in many palliative settings. Improving surgery capacity is therefore a major contribution to reducing the 8.2 million cancer deaths annually and associated pain and suffering.
UICC therefore welcomes the focus on strengthening essential surgical care at this year’s Executive Board. We thank the Secretariat for this report, and will provide a detailed written commentary. In the meantime we highlight some key points:
- Globally, cancer surgery is second only to trauma and orthopaedics in volumes of procedures carried out and need.
- The requirements for cancer surgery (e.g. mastectomy) are more complex than the general surgical procedures needed to address trauma.
- The availability of services is no guarantee of their accessibility. As underlined in the report there are major gaps in access to surgical services including human resource limitations and financial barriers.
- We challenge the data reported, and suggest that 313 rather than 234 million surgical procedures are performed globally, resulting in a need for 143 million additional procedures annually in LMICs alone.
- To effectively address these gaps, the Secretariat should go beyond assessment and monitoring and promote cross-cluster collaboration across WHO, international organisations organizations, and civil society professional bodies, academia and NGOs to strengthen surgical services within existing health delivery platforms including care for NCDs at the district and sub-district levels.
We offer you our continued support, and point out the pending publications from the Lancet Commission and Disease Control Priorities that will further inform this topic. We look forward to further discussions at the May WHA.